P9 B Wayfair Go No Go Package

# P9-B Wayfair Go/No-Go Decision Package
 
This document defines the minimum package required to run a credible Wayfair go/no-go decision meeting.
 
## Goal
 
Convert Wayfair readiness from ad hoc discussion into a repeatable decision process with:
 
- explicit acceptance criteria
- validated evidence artifacts
- a scheduled decision meeting with owners and outcomes
 
## Owners
 
- Product owner: Founder
- Engineering owner: Platform Eng lead
- Customer owner: Wayfair stakeholder
- Decision driver: Founder
 
## Required Inputs
 
- Latest customer requirement notes (feature, data, timeline constraints)
- Current platform capability snapshot (what is already shipped in main)
- Selected dataset path for demo validation
- Known gaps and mitigation options
 
## Checklist (Gate Items)
 
Mark each as `PASS`, `PARTIAL`, or `FAIL`.
 
| ID | Item | Evidence | Status | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | Requirements list is explicit and approved by customer contact | Requirement doc + confirmation note | TBD | Product |
| B2 | Demo dataset path selected (`sample` vs `full`) | Dataset decision section below | TBD | Product + Eng |
| B3 | TRADE workflow validation completed on selected dataset | Run output + screenshots | TBD | Eng |
| B4 | SIMA outcomes/reasoning are explainable for top flagged SKUs | Evidence export + notes | TBD | Eng |
| B5 | Report/export artifacts are customer-readable | Export samples attached | TBD | Product |
| B6 | Known gaps documented with severity + mitigation + ETA | Gap log table | TBD | Eng |
| B7 | Decision meeting scheduled with required attendees | Calendar invite link | TBD | Product |
 
## Dataset Decision
 
Choose one path and record rationale.
 
### Option A: Sample dataset (faster)
 
Use when the objective is workflow proof and stakeholder alignment.
 
- Pros: quick setup, fast iteration
- Cons: lower confidence in scale/edge-case behavior
 
### Option B: Full dataset (higher confidence)
 
Use when the objective is pre-commit validation and risk reduction.
 
- Pros: realistic behavior under customer-like volume
- Cons: longer setup, slower iteration
 
**Selected option:** `TBD`
 
**Rationale:** `TBD`
 
## Demo Validation Runbook
 
1. Confirm staging environment health is green.
2. Load selected dataset.
3. Execute core TRADE path end-to-end:
   - classification flow
   - SIMA screening/results review
   - landed-cost path (internal by default)
4. Export customer-facing artifacts.
5. Log failures/gaps and rerun only failed checkpoints.
 
## Evidence Artifacts
 
Store artifacts in a single folder for meeting prep.
 
Recommended location:
 
- `docs/partners/wayfair-go-no-go/<YYYY-MM-DD>/`
 
Required artifacts:
 
- checklist with statuses (`checklist.md`)
- demo script (`demo-script.md`)
- screenshot set for key steps
- export samples (CSV/PDF if applicable)
- gap log (`gaps.md`)
 
## Gap Log Template
 
| Gap | Severity | Customer impact | Mitigation | Owner | ETA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| _TBD_ | _TBD_ | _TBD_ | _TBD_ | _TBD_ | _TBD_ |
 
## Decision Criteria
 
Use this rubric at the decision meeting.
 
- **GO**: all critical checklist items pass; no unmitigated high-risk gaps.
- **CONDITIONAL GO**: one or more critical items are partial, with agreed mitigation and near-term ETA.
- **NO-GO**: critical failures remain with no acceptable mitigation path.
 
## Decision Meeting Template
 
- Duration: 30 minutes
- Required attendees: Product owner, Engineering owner, Wayfair stakeholder
- Inputs reviewed: checklist, artifacts, gaps, mitigation plan
- Decision recorded: `GO | CONDITIONAL GO | NO-GO`
- Next action recorded with owner/date
 
## Exit Gate (P9-B)
 
P9-B is complete when:
 
- checklist is fully populated with evidence links
- go/no-go meeting is scheduled
- decision criteria are explicitly documented and acknowledged by owners